no-deportations.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the no-deportations.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host no-deportations.org.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Mailbox Internet Ltd .

the related websites

thenewamerican.com histclo.com noborders.org.uk liverpoolecho.co.uk ft.com thesun.co.uk bbc.co.uk bbc.com telegraph.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

news & views monday 11th june to sunday 17th june 2018 no-deportations - residence papers for all home contact about no-deportations stop 'double punishment' of foreign nationals quick links search latest newszine subscribe/donate no-deportations if you are liable to detention and deportation - you must what moves the world to move? never doubt the butchers apron nellie de jongh winning campaigns images of resistance self-harm in immigration detention 34 deaths across the uk detention estate families/individuals who campaigned against deportation and won archives immigration solicitors news & views monday 11th june to sunday 17th june 2018 online petition: stop the removal of duc kien nguyen duc was trafficked into the uk from vietnam and was forced to work in an illegal cannabis farm. he was arrested in a raid and subsequently imprisoned. he now faces deportation following crimes he was forced to commit to a country where he risks persecution of gang violence. these are duc's own words about his situation: "hello, i just wanted to briefly my life since i arrived to the uk i was forced to a house where i have to grow cannabis without a chance to escape because of gangster and underworld groups i was arrested and served 6 months in prison, during this time i have lodged a claim for asylum and i worked hard to gain money to pay for the charged from court. after 6 months in prison i was detained in detention for 1 year and a half, i was converted to christianity during the time. during the time in both prison and detention i have tried my best to do anything which helpful for you and your country as to repay for the harm i have done earlier and became a good christian. i did as much helpful thing as possible and it was so impressed in the prison officer's eyes i have got a lot of praises come from them. i was released and relocated in glasgow at this time i still attend church of scotland every sunday and i was volunteering at lambhill stables the whole weekday, i love this organization they were reserving the wildlife and did a lot of thing helpful for social and i like to do that too. i like to do something helpful for you uk that was the truth. but now i was refused my claim asylum and have no right to appeal, the ho have arranged my flight to return to vn on 13 of june. i don't wish this happen, i like to cancel my flight and i like to go to judicial review. i did something which against vietnam's government. i was in debt with a huge amount of money from gangster in vn and i would be kill if i have to return to vn not only by the government but by gangsters in vn as well." please sign this petition and contact your local mp, caroline nokes and sajid javid to demand that duc is not removed from the uk! you can sign the petition here: https://is.gd/dosfqi government urged to do more to end discrimination in british nationality law a new report by the joint committee on human rights was issued last month, discussing discrimination within british nationality law. according to the report, the government has proposed changes aimed at eliminating this discrimination although the committee felt that the government is not doing enough. the report noted that discrimination on the grounds of a parent’s gender or marital status persists in some areas of citizenship law. in principle, british nationality is governed by the british nationality act 1981, which came into force in 1983. until the year 2000, passing on british citizenship to children was more difficult for unmarried couples or women. section 4 of the act was subsequently heavily amended in order to address this issue and sections 4c, 4f, 4g, 4h, and 4i were added, however, citizenship is not automatically granted under these amendments. those applying for registration must still satisfy the home office’s good character requirement. in october 2016, the supreme court found that the good character requirement was incompatible with the human rights act 1998 in the case of r (on the application of johnson) (appellant) v secretary of state for the home department. this prompted parliament to draft the british nationality act 1981 (remedial) order 2018, so that the good character requirement can be removed entirely from section 4 applications. the government expects that the remedial order will be passed in early 2019. nevertheless, the committee found that there is still likely to be persistent discrimination in acquiring british nationality “ depending on whether a person’s father or mother was a british overseas territories citizen, or whether or not their parents were married ”. furthermore, the committee advised that this type of discrimination in the british nationality act “ should be remedied for all types of british nationality and we recommend that the home secretary take urgent steps to bring forward legislation to do so ”. in the meantime, the home office has confirmed that applications for registration as a british citizen under sections 4c, 4f, 4g, 4h and 4i where the only concern about an applicant is in respect of good character are on hold until the remedial order comes into force. posted by: gherson immigration, 1106/2018, https://is.gd/znm9lx gay asylum seeker faces deportation from uk to nigeria a nigerian asylum seeker who fled to britain to avoid prosecution for being gay is facing deportation after being held for six months in an immigration detention centre. the threat hanging over adeniyi raji, 43, who received death threats on social media, highlights the increasing number of claims to the home office by individuals from countries where homosexuality is outlawed. in nigeria, homosexual acts are punishable by up to 14 years in prison. gay marriage and displays of same-sex affection are also outlawed. after pakistan and bangladesh, it is the country that produces the largest number of asylum claims based on sexual orientation. home office figures published last year show there were 362 such applications from nigerians in the 21 months from july 2015 to march 2017. of those, only 63 were allowed to remain in the uk after a tribunal hearing; the rest, 81%, were refused permission to stay. read more: owen bowcott, guardian, https://is.gd/sng0ol roo (nigeria), r (on the application of) v sshd the high court ruled in favour of the claimant by concluding that the secretary of state for the home department (sshd) had failed to exercise ‘anxious scrutiny’ before certifying her asylum claim under s.96 (2) nationality, immigration and asylum act 2002 (niaa). the court also found that the sshd’s subsequent paragraph 353 refusal was irrational as it had ‘the flavour of someone trying to find justifications for upholding their earlier decision’. this case concerns a female nigerian national who claimed asylum on the basis that she was a lesbian: her account was that her family had caught her with another girl when she was a teenager and tortured her. she was subjected to female genital mutilation (fgm) as a means of punishment/control and she subsequently lived discreetly in nigeria due to fear. she came to the uk to study and was pressurised by her family to get married. she decided to marry an eea national in the uk, rather than return to nigeria. the marriage broke down and she made an application for leave to remain on the basis of private life. this was refused with an out-of-country right of appeal. she remained in the uk, until the immigration authorities found her. her claim was rejected by the defendant on credibility grounds and certified under section 96 niaa 2002, on the basis that she previously had been served a one-stop notice and had not claimed asylum earlier. after the decision to certify her claim was made, a rule 35(3) report confirmed that she may be a victim of torture and an adult at risk at level 2. judicial review proceedings were issued to challenge the sshd’s decision to certify the claimant’s asylum claim and their decision to detain her under the detained asylum casework process despite her vulnerabilities and the complexity of her claim. during the course of the proceedings, the sshd invited the claimant to submit further evidence in relation to her claim and released her from detention as her removal was no longer imminent. the evidence later submitted by the claimant consisted of detailed statements from the claimant and her solicitor, along with expert medical evidence which confirmed that the claimant was most likely a victim of an unsuccessful fgm procedure, that she was a likely victim of torture as she had 46 visible recorded scars on her body, and that she was suffering from severe depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms associated with ptsd. read more: duncan lewis, https://is.gd/tz7gpm 8 deaths in immigration detention march 2017 to march 2018 in the period 1 march 2017 to 1 march 2018 there have been 8 deaths of individuals while detained in an immigration removal centre under immigration powers or shortly after release. of these deaths none has yet been determined by a coroner to be a self-inflicted death. any death in immigration detention is subject to investigation by the police, the coroner (or procurator fiscal in scotland) and the independent prisons and probation ombudsman. staff at all immigration removal centres are trained to identify those at risk of self-harm so that action can be taken to minimise the risk. all incidents of self harm are treated very seriously and every step is taken to prevent incidents of this nature. formal risk assessments on initial detention and systems for raising concerns at any subsequent point feed into established self-harm procedures in every irc, which are in turn underpinned by the home office operating standard on the prevention of self-harm and detention services order 06/2008 assessment care in detention teamwork (acdt). hansard 11/06/2017, https://is.gd/yti5bv right to rent rules discriminate against foreign nationals legal challenges have been launched against the home office over its ‘right to rent’ rules, requiring landlords to check the immigration status of tenants. the ‘right to rent’ scheme was introduced across england in 2016 and legally requires landlords to confirm that potential tenants have a right to live in the uk. the reasoning behind the scheme is that if those who are in the uk illegally are unable to find housing, they are more likely to voluntarily leave the country. landlords who fail to comply face a fine of up to £3,000 or up to 5 years in prison. critics claim that this forces landlords to act as border guards and that the rules have led to widespread discrimination against non-uk nationals. the home office is now facing two legal challenges that seek to reverse this aspect of its ‘hostile environment policy’. one case concerns a woman who applied to extend her student visa but the home office lost her passport and she has been unable to obtain a replacement passport from her country of origin. she is now applying to remain in the uk as a stateless person but in the meantime her immigration status is uncertain. as a result her landlord is now evicting her from her accommodation. the other case is being brought by the joint council for the welfare of immigrants (jcwi), following research that it carried out last year revealing that the ‘right to rent’ policy has resulted in widespread discrimination. jcwi’s research found that 51% of landlords would be less likely to let a property to a foreign national due to the right to rent rules and 48% said that they would not rent to foreign nationals because of the risk of criminal sanctions. the council is calling for a full evaluation of the scheme and its effects. according to chai patel, legal policy director at jcwi, “the problem with it, apart from the inhumanity of that proposition, is that there’s no evidence it works. the home office hasn’t shown that the scheme will do anything to increase voluntary departures, which have actually reduced since the scheme came into force”. mps have also raised concerns that the policy forces those with uncertain immigration status to rent from ‘rogue landlords’, who are likely to take advantage of people by offering poor quality, poorly maintained accommodation at unreasonable prices. phillippa kaufmann qc, representing jcwi, has said that the ‘right to rent’ policy is unjustified as the government is not able to prove that it is having “the desired effect of prompting illegal migrants to leave, rather than going underground to be exploited by rogue landlords”. the home office has refused to comment on this matter. posted by: gherson immigration, https://is.gd/q0uzp3

URL analysis for no-deportations.org.uk

http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/resources/contactno-deportations'.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/resources/aboutfreemovement.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/media-2014/double
punishment.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/media-1/butchersapron.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/nellidejohngh/articlesndj.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/images
of
resistance.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/constant/archives.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/resources/quicklinks.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/media-1-2012/seekingeconomicasylum.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/resources/self-harm2007-2016.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/resources/solicitorsuk.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/resources/neverdoubt.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/resources/searchno-dep.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/index-1.html
http://www.no-deportations.org.uk/../media-6-4-2011/deathinremovalcentres.html

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
no-deportations.org.uk

Registrant:
John O

Trading as:
John O

Registrant type:
UK Individual

Registrant's address:
22 Berners Street
Birmingham
Warks
B19 2DR
United Kingdom

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 08-Jun-2017

Registrar:
Mailbox Internet Ltd [Tag = MAILBOX]
URL: http://www.freedomnames.net

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 16-Oct-2011
Expiry date: 16-Oct-2017
Last updated: 08-Jun-2017

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
a.ns.186k.co.uk 194.12.14.19
b.ns.186k.co.uk 83.136.124.151
c.ns.as8401.net
d.ns.as8401.net

WHOIS lookup made at 16:06:38 29-Sep-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS no-deportations.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION John O

TYPE
UK Individual

ADDRESS
22 Berners Street
Birmingham
Warks
B19 2DR
United Kingdom
Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 08-Jun-2017

DOMAIN

  SPONSOR Mailbox Internet Ltd [Tag = MAILBOX]

  CREATED 2011-10-16

  CHANGED 2017-06-08

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  A.NS.186K.CO.UK 194.12.14.19

  B.NS.186K.CO.UK 83.136.124.151

  C.NS.AS8401.NET 91.208.114.10

  D.NS.AS8401.NET 212.85.248.120

  NAME no-deportations.org.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .